The Latest

In 2005, the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA) has organised a highly successful global theme conference on SEA in Prague. As we are IAIA members and the topic is of particular interest for us, we were there and awed at the experience and creative thinking on the future of SEA and its usefulness. The enthusiasm about SEA, this new planning and assessment tool, was stirring in the air, contacts from IAIA 2004 conference in Vancouver were strengthened and browsing through literature had no limits. In later years, the experience and exchange of information with the contacts from the conference have been invaluable for our work. In Slovenia, SEA was introduced only in 2004; most of the SEAs are done for spatial plans of different levels (including the minuscule ones that can be also seen as projects worth of EIAs) and there is not only lack of competition, but also little exchange of experience. So far the greatest Oikos’s opportunity as well as challenge in terms of SEA of a programme were SEAs for Operational Programmes of Structural Funds in Slovenia in 2006, where we could really put Prague SEA conference lessons in practice.

The next EU programming period is around the corner and I am sure that SEA practitioners are looking forward to the “Prague II” SEA conference that was recently announced for September 2011. The conference is being held to celebrate the 10th Anniversary of the introduction of the EC SEA Directive and the coming into force of the UNECE SEA Protocol. However, it is not only EU-based SEA practitioners that are aspiring to exchange experience; SEA has been evolving as a useful tool around the world, supported not only by national legislation, but also through donor plans and programmes (e.g. Motenegro, Mekong River Basin) that support use of SEA. However, there are also doubts on its effectiveness: does SEA really help to manage environmental change and curb losses of biodiversity and ecoystem services, or is it just a “nice try”? It is the best to seek the answer in person in Prague in Septemeber: I am sure that the presentations and posters will be just the daily basis for creative discussions with some of the best SEA practitioners and wibrant networks knitted  over “veprove kolenky” and some Pils in the lunchtime and the evenings in the city.

Regional smart specialization strategies will require changes in almost any respect imaginable. Regional leadership will have to understand the strategy it is developing with all its benefits and weaknesses possible. Regions will need to focus their resources to small selected number of topics in order to gain concentration and be able to step in a world of competitiveness. Only drawing the strategy will not be enough this time if we all want to achieve positive change expected local and regional objectives will need to merge while the national policies will have to follow.

In partnership among regions and national administration and politics smart specialization strategies will need to define how and who. Even more intervention and structural change measures will need to change, change fast in order to follow implementation defined in smart strategies.

When an opportunity is defined as a smart selection of the region all other policies will need to follow. We do expect the national education system to be refocused to fit the needs of regions with smart specialisation strategies, health system to be managed towards this same needs, competitiveness measures to follow, nature conservation rules to follow, too. This will require national administration and politics to be flexible and ready for change. This is to be a question for the future.

At the moment national development policy stands on closed non coordinated policies driven by each ministry and implementing agency. These policies are hard to change. That is where push from politics will be necessary in order to gain a momentum for  smart specialization. To date any government was able to overcome closed and limited view of ministries to start focusing to development.

The time to open a discussion and partnership on smart specialisation is here. Not because the European commission said so. Multi level governance is a reality when we need to design our way out to competitiveness. Let’s see who is for real and who will play along.

Business advise #2

On April 6, 2011, in Regional growth, by Jurij Kobal
0

Regions will start developing new regional development programs for the new financing period soon. Some better regions already know what is their unique selling point they are already building their strategies.

Business community needs to get out there and join the planning process. This will help both regions and business community. Regions will be able to develop stronger strategies based on realistic and relevant understanding of needs and opportunities. The planning process will be oriented towards objectives with right mixture of ownership and responsibility. Business community will be able to understand how to build networks and participate in regional policy having their say in designing growth incentives.

Tagged with:
 

Association of European Border Regions organized R&D and Innovation in Cross-Border Areas conference. The conference was organized under invitation of Mr. Alfonso Rueda Valenzuela, Regional Minister of the Presidency, Public Administration and Justice, Xunta de Galicia, Spain and Mrs. Ana Teresa Lehman, Vice-president, Regional Coordination and Development Commission, Norte Region, Portugal. The conference is chaired by Mr. Martín Guillermo Ramírez, Secretary General, AEBR

We were happy to be invited for this important meeting to present our experiences in regional policies shaping. Main lessons learned can be set in three major packages:

Less developed regions are not successful in developing understandable and short strategies which leads to weak leadership and vice versa. Weak regions are not able to develop smart specialization strategies and lead their development an understanding of their unique selling points and base their development on real opportunities. These processes are often supported from national level which has no tools or policy to understand regions a place but pushes national policies on principle “whenever and what ever” take it or leave it. State simply applies any policy it wants to without understanding real needs and relevance for the region in question.

Opening of the AEBR Forum in Vigo

State officials and administration doesn’t change fast they have their way of doing things while regional officials and managers do not change fast either. Regions with developed agenda will employ managers to implement their strategy whatever it takes. But being careful in understanding that short term actions provide some short term impact while long term solutions need time and planning. Patience in implementation stage will play a central role in development of the region and politicians will need to be able to wait for results. Regions will have to develop strategic projects but also be to develop monitoring ability to shape implementation when changes are necessary also this will require time and multilevel cooperation.

Politics tent to have wide open strategies while Smart regions on the other hand will play for strong, smart strategies which will give them ability to concentrate resources to achieve long term results. Setting mile stones and indicators will help both regional level managers and politicians to have their satisfaction. Multilevel coordination which will lead national policies to respect regional ones will make implementation of strategies and achieving objectives possible.



Tagged with:
 

Working in South East Europe

On April 1, 2011, in This is who we are, by Jurij Kobal
0

One of our top project managers Jurij Kobal held a training in Project cycle management for the Pelagonia region in Macedonia.  the training was organized by the MCMS. The training was organized for representatives of the regional development agency, municipalities and other interested participants from the Pelagonia region.

Tagged with:
 

For the 4th year in a row, Oikos held the information session on LIFE+ which is the largest EU  »bottom up« financial insturment for environment, organised by Stella Consulting and MWH for the European Commission. This year the event was held in Maribor with a record of almost 80 participants. Each year sees larger support and participation by the Ministry of the Environment and presentations of some of the past or ongoing co-financed projects. What about the participants? What does their structure and input say about environmental ideas in Slovenia? In these 4 years, the audience has shifted from largely nature conservation bunch, mostly of the usual NGO type, to SMEs and industry, institutes and PR agencies. The project ideas are more and more sparkling, often also very innovative and building on previous research just waiting to be used in practice. But… usually, one of the key points is missing – the European dimension. Small state – small mind one could say, as it is difficult to look beyond the borders – the perimeter of a good hour drive from Ljubljana in each direction. Mostly, the projects are striving to be the first of a certain type in Slovenia, perhaps with a regional partner from one of the neighbouring countries, and that’s it. On the average, this attitude lowers the quality of the projects that apply for LIFE+ funds. It is true that the number of successful projects has increased in the last 4 years, however, but so did the number of applications. Is such a narrow focus a limitation? Yes it is – not just for the use of LIFE+ funds, but also for environmental innovation and competitiveness of Slovene economy. The key solution to this is to build in the European dimension on all levels within Slovenia, and to stop being humble on the individual level. There are several great examples of environmental innovation, but there would be more if these great examples were keeping higher profile.

 

Technology megaplayer Google – known widely for attracting some of the most talented web developers in the world – is using its position as a large employer in a small city to encourage smart growth development. In a letter to the City of Mountain View, CA, where the company has its headquarters, Google encouraged planners to pursue sustainable development strategies. Mountain View is currently working to update its strategy for development, and asked for public input on the decisions to be made. In the letter Google VP David Radcliffe voiced the company’s support for “mixed-use development…along with the kind of land use development described in the Final Report by the Mountain View Environmental Sustainability Task Force.” The Task Force’s recommendations – which focus on strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions – would improve the quality of life for Google’s 20,000 Mountain View employees, Radcliffe explained, as well as help the city fiscally and for the long-term. From the company’s letter:

We would encourage you to provide opportunities for the North Bayshore area to continue to be the center of sustainable development for Google’s HQ campus…[and] the model Silicon Valley community – leading the way with visionary development opportunities to create the most efficient, sustainable and fiscally supportive plan to the community of Mountain View and the North Bayshore area.

Google’s support of innovative growth strategies is in line with President Obama’s State of the Union address in January. In that speech, the President emphasized that in order to stay competitive in a global, 21st century economy, America will have to invest strategically in innovative infrastructure projects that reduce our dependence on oil and spur economic growth. The Final Report of Mountain View’s Environmental Task Force reaches many of these same conclusions – advocating for a balance between jobs and housing, increased public transportation usage in the region, a green business certification system, a pedestrian master plan and preservation of open land among many, many other things. While Mountain View’s primary intent is to reduce carbon emissions, in accordance with California’s planning laws, smart growth development strategies like these create many benefits for the community. Locating housing closer to jobs, schools and stores means stronger businesses, lower costs for the local government and a better economy too. Google is a prime example of how this can benefit large companies as well. By creating better housing and transportation options, Mountain View can help Google grow and be a beneficial member of its business community for years to come.

via Smart growth in demand: Google asks Mountain View, CA for mixed-use development | Smart Growth America.

 

Why Smart Growth?

On March 13, 2011, in Smart news from others, by Oikos
0

Health, schools, taxes, traffic, the environment, economic growth, fairness, opportunity—many of the things we care about—are all affected by development decisions. From the length of our daily commute to the price of a new home to the safety of our neighborhoods-what, where, and how we build have major impacts on our personal lives, our com munities, and our nation.

Growth presents a tremendous opportunity for progress. Communities around the country are looking for ways to get the most out of new development and to maximize their investments. Frustrated by development that requires residents to drive long distances between jobs and homes, many communities are challenging rules that make it impossible to put workplaces, homes, and services closer together. Many communities are questioning the fiscal wisdom of neglecting existing infrastructure while expanding new sewers, roads, and services into the fringe. And in many communities where development has improved daily life, the economy, and the environment, smart growth principles have been key to that success.

Growth is “smart” when it gives us great communities, with more choices and personal freedom, good return on public investment, greater opportunity across the community, a thriving natural environment, and a legacy we can be proud to leave our children and grandchildren.

When communities choose smart growth strategies, they can create new neighborhoods and maintain existing ones that are attractive, convenient, safe, and healthy. They can foster design that encourages social, civic, and physical activity. They can protect the environment while stimulating economic growth. Most of all, we can create more choices for residents, workers, visitors, children, families, single people, and older adults-choices in where to live, how to get around, and how to interact with the people around them. When communities do this kind of planning, they preserve the best of their past while creating a bright future for generations to come.

Adapted from the PDF “This is Smart Growth,” published by ICMA and EPA in 2006.

via Why Smart Growth? || Smart Growth Online.

 

Nature conservation seems to have gone the other way as competitivness did. Both will need to merge in order to best serve regions and thier specialization needs.
Nature conservated areas are not isolated sites but potential for regional specialization. By developing value chain nature can offer sustainable and valuable source for branding, specialized products, energy efficincy projects and others.
But nature conservation and regional development will need to focus to specialization in order to get it done. Natura 2000, species, directives will have their point if coordinated with regional competitivness factors.
Nature conservation is a tool for smart specialization while management plans for protected areas are place based intervention.

Tagged with:
 

Business advise #1

On March 11, 2011, in Regional growth, by Jurij Kobal
0

Regions are in close corelation with business. Regional growth is fully depending on business growth. But be carefull regions need to develop skills and tools to invite business in development and vise versa. So do business peole need to get involved in regional strategies development and implmentation. Hand in hand would be the right choice here.
Business community rarely understands regional strategies and does not even have a will to understand. Also we will need to develop skils to get involved.
Only regions with close business relations will prevail.